Nitrile vs Latex vs PU Gloves: Wholesale Buyer Comparison Guide

Almost every coated work glove on the market is built the same way at the core: a knitted liner, dipped into a polymer to form the palm coating. The liner decides the cut resistance and the comfort. The coating decides the grip, the chemical resistance, the abrasion life — and, for a distributor, most of the price difference between two gloves that look identical in a catalogue photo.

Nitrile, latex and polyurethane (PU) are the three coatings that cover roughly 90% of the global coated-glove market. Choosing between them is the single most consequential specification decision a glove importer makes, because it drives the end-use application the glove can be sold into, the complaint rate you will see from your customers, and the cost per pair you can defend in a tender.

This guide is written for importers, distributors and private-label buyers sourcing from China. It compares the three coatings on the metrics that actually decide an order — EN388 performance, chemical resistance, wet and oily grip, wear life, FOB price tiers, MOQ structure and OEM options — and shows how to split a container between them without creating dead stock.

1. The Three Coatings Explained

All three coatings are applied by dipping a knitted liner into a liquid polymer bath, then curing. The chemistry of that bath determines everything that follows.

Nitrile (NBR)

Nitrile butadiene rubber is a synthetic polymer with excellent resistance to oils, greases, fuels and a broad range of industrial solvents. It is applied in three main finishes: smooth nitrile (a flat, sealed palm for dry handling and light chemical splash), nitrile foam (a microcellular surface that channels liquid away from the contact point, giving strong wet and oily grip), and sandy nitrile (a coarse, grit-like finish that produces the highest abrasion resistance of any coated glove). Because nitrile contains no natural rubber proteins, it carries no latex allergy risk — a decisive advantage in food handling and healthcare-adjacent applications.

Latex (Natural Rubber)

Natural rubber latex delivers the highest elasticity and the best dry flexibility of the three. Its crinkle finish grips wet surfaces better than any alternative, which is why latex remains standard in construction, masonry, roofing and general outdoor work where surfaces are wet but not oily. The weaknesses are equally clear: natural rubber is degraded by oils, greases and organic solvents, it has poor resistance to ozone and UV ageing, and it contains proteins that cause Type I and Type IV allergic reactions in a meaningful share of the workforce.

PU (Polyurethane)

PU is applied extremely thin — typically 0.6–1.0 mm against 1.5–3.0 mm for a nitrile foam palm. That thinness is its entire value proposition. A PU-coated glove is the closest thing to bare-hand sensitivity available in a protective glove, which makes it the default for electronics assembly, precision instrumentation, small-parts handling and light packaging work. It gives good dry and light-oil grip but is not a chemical barrier and should never be sold as one.

2. Performance Comparison: The Data Table

The table below summarises the three coatings across the properties that determine end use. Values are typical for a mid-weight 13–15 gauge liner; a heavier liner or a double dip will shift abrasion and puncture figures upward.

Two things are worth reading carefully out of that table. First, the coating does not set the cut level — the liner does. A nitrile-coated glove on an HPPE liner can reach EN388 level E, while the same nitrile on a cotton liner will not pass level B. Second, the pricing overlap is wide, which means the cheapest quotation is usually telling you something about liner weight and dipping passes, not about the coating chemistry.

3. EN388 Ratings Across the Three Coatings

EN388 is the European standard for mechanical risks and reports four digits plus two optional letters. In reading order: abrasion, cut (Coupe test), tear, puncture, then the ISO 13997 cut letter (A–F) and, for impact-rated gloves, a P mark. The abrasion digit is where the coating choice shows up most directly.

• Nitrile foam and sandy nitrile routinely reach abrasion 4, the maximum. Under continuous handling of concrete, brick, ore and metal parts, a sandy nitrile palm outlasts a latex crinkle palm by a factor of roughly two to three.
• Latex crinkle typically achieves abrasion 2–3. It grips wet surfaces better but wears through faster against dry abrasives, and begins to perish when stored in sunlight.
• PU usually reaches abrasion 1–3. It is not a high-wear coating; PU gloves are consumed by handling frequency, not by abrasion severity.

For buyers comparing quotations, the practical rule is to always request the complete marking on the test report rather than a single headline number. Two gloves sold as “cut level C” can differ by two full abrasion grades, which shows up in the field as a glove that fails in three weeks instead of three months. Our EN388 cut levels guide walks through the full A–F scale and the test-method switch at level C.

4. Chemical Resistance: Where Nitrile Wins Decisively

Nitrile's resistance to petroleum-based oils, fuels and non-polar solvents is the single strongest reason it holds the largest share of the industrial coated-glove market.

• Nitrile resists mineral oils, hydraulic fluid, diesel, petrol, cutting fluid, animal fats and vegetable oils, plus many alcohols and dilute acids. It is degraded by strong ketones, esters, concentrated acids and aromatic solvents.
• Latex is attacked by oils and organic solvents, which swell and soften the rubber. A latex glove exposed regularly to cutting oil will fail at the palm within days.
• PU resists light oils and some solvents moderately, but it is a thin film and is not a chemical barrier. It should never be specified where chemical contact is the primary hazard.

Where chemical exposure is a genuine, named hazard — not just the presence of oil — buyers should move from a coated handling glove to a certified chemical glove tested to EN374 or EN ISO 374, and check a permeation breakthrough table for the specific substance. A nitrile-coated knit glove is the right product for oily handling; it is not a substitute for a chemical-protective glove. Buyers who confuse the two create the most common liability exposure in this category. See also our EN374 chemical gloves guide.

5. Grip and Dexterity in Wet, Oily and Dry Conditions

Grip is the most over-claimed and least tested property in glove marketing. In practice it breaks down into three distinct conditions, and no single coating wins all three.

The trade-off nobody mentions is that grip and dexterity pull in opposite directions. Adding coating thickness improves grip and abrasion life while steadily degrading tactile feedback. A worker assembling a 6 mm bolt needs to feel the thread; a worker stacking kerbstones does not. This is exactly why a distributor selling into a mixed industrial market should carry at least one thin PU SKU alongside the nitrile range rather than trying to serve every customer with one product.

6. Durability and Cost Per Wear Cycle

Unit price is a poor proxy for cost. What a distributor's customer actually experiences is cost per wear cycle — which the coating controls more than any other variable.

In abrasion-heavy work such as handling concrete blocks, steel sections or castings, a sandy nitrile palm consistently delivers the highest number of shifts per pair. Nitrile foam is close behind and preferred where grip on oily parts matters more than raw abrasion. Latex crinkle sits in the middle: excellent on wet masonry, but it perishes faster and its performance degrades noticeably with UV exposure in outdoor storage. PU gloves have the shortest life in abrasive environments but the lowest unit cost, and in clean assembly work that trade is strongly favourable because the glove fails from contamination and loss long before it fails from wear.

Two further factors affect real-world life as much as the coating does:

• Cuff length and finish. A knitted wrist lets debris into the glove and shortens life; an elasticated knit wrist is the volume standard, while a gauntlet cuff is required wherever forearms are exposed.
• Laundering. Nitrile and PU can be laundered a limited number of times under controlled conditions for reuse programmes. Latex should not be laundered. Claims of “washable” multiply the effective selling price of a nitrile or PU line and are worth including in your catalogue copy where accurate.

7. FOB Pricing Tiers and MOQ Structure

Chinese coated-glove pricing is quoted FOB by port (Qingdao or Ningbo for most Shandong production), per pair, at a stated MOQ. The figures below are indicative for standard sizes 8–10 with a 13–15 gauge liner and a single palm dip.

Indicative ranges only. Final FOB depends on liner gauge, cut level, number of dips, size curve, packaging and colour.

Volume breaks in this category are real but shallower than most first-time buyers expect: an 8–15% reduction moving from MOQ to a full container is normal, with the larger part of the discount coming from liner specification and packaging than from the coating itself. Where buyers do find bigger savings is in the size curve and packaging: accepting a mixed size curve across the standard S–XXL spread, and a polybag rather than a branded colour box, removes two of the most common cost adders. Our MOQ guide and China sourcing guide cover the negotiation detail.

8. OEM Options, Private Label and Branding

Coated gloves are one of the easiest product categories to private-label, because the liner and coating are separate processes and branding is added at the cuff or back of hand rather than on the working surface. The main OEM levers are:

• Custom colour. A custom liner or coating colour normally requires 3,000–6,000 pairs per colour. It is the single most effective way to make a commodity glove look like your own product.
• Cuff label and woven label. A printed cuff band with your brand, standard and size markings is the lowest-cost customisation and typically has the smallest MOQ.
• Back-of-hand printing. Logo printing on the back of the hand is safe for certification because it does not touch the tested palm surface. Printing on the palm or coating is generally avoided as it can interfere with grip test results.
• Retail packaging. Header cards, hang tags, barcodes, polybag printing and shelf-ready inner packs are all available at modest tooling cost.

The certification consequence is worth stating plainly: the CE type-examination certificate covers the glove model as tested. Colour changes and cuff labelling usually do not invalidate it, but changing the liner, the coating thickness, the number of dips or the palm finish does. Any supplier willing to change those without re-testing is creating a compliance risk that lands on the importer, because it is the importer who places the product on the market.

9. Certification Requirements by Market

Notice that cut and impact protection fall under different standards in the US and the EU, and that chemical protection is a separate certification again. A glove can legitimately carry an EN388 marking without any EN ISO 374 approval, and it is common for buyers to assume otherwise. For thermal and vibration hazards the relevant frameworks are EN407 and EN ISO 10819 respectively — neither is implied by a coated palm. The current requirements are published on the European Commission's PPE pages, with the full legal text of Regulation (EU) 2016/425 on EUR-Lex. See also our EU PPE Regulation 2016/425 guide for the importer's obligations.

10. How to Allocate a Container Between Coatings

The allocation question comes up on almost every first container order: should the whole load be one coating, or split? Splitting is almost always the better commercial decision, because the three coatings sell into genuinely different customer types.

A workable starting point for a general industrial distributor is roughly 50% nitrile (foam and sandy, split by grip preference), 30% latex crinkle for wet and outdoor work, and 20% PU for assembly and precision handling. Buyers serving automotive or oil and gas customers should push nitrile to 60–70% and reduce latex. Buyers serving electronics, assembly or light packaging customers can push PU as high as 40%.

11. Sourcing Checklist for Coated Gloves

Before placing a coated-glove order with any supplier, confirm each of the following in writing:

• Liner specification, not just the coating — gauge, fibre (polyester, nylon, HPPE, aramid), and whether the cut level was tested on the finished glove.
• Complete EN388 marking (or ANSI/ISEA 105 cut level for the US) from an accredited laboratory, with the test report, not a summary graphic.
• Notified body number on the CE type-examination certificate for Category II and III gloves, verifiable in the EU NANDO database.
• Sizes and size curve available, and whether extra sizes carry a price premium.
• Dipping passes and coating coverage — palm only, palm and back, or full dip — since this changes both price and performance.
• Packaging format and whether the quoted price is per pair or per dozen, since both conventions are used in this category.
• MOQ per colour and per style, and whether colours can be mixed to reach MOQ.
• Sample lead time and production lead time from deposit, with the port of loading named.
• Complaint history or third-party batch test reports, which separates a trading company from a factory that actually controls dipping.

For quality-control terms that protect the buyer at goods-in inspection, our glove QC and AQL inspection guide sets out how to define an acceptable quality limit in the purchase contract.

Related Guides